Under any circumstances, the Bush administration's sudden, explicitly political dismissal and replacement of United States attorneys in judicial districts across the country would be very troubling -- both as a violation of American law enforcement traditions and as a triumph of patronage over competence.
But as the story behind these strange decisions unfolds, a familiar theme is emerging. Again, the White House and the Justice Department have been exposed in a secretive attempt to expand executive power for partisan purposes. And again, their scheming is tainted with a nasty whiff of authoritarianism....
Any such self-serving statements emanating from Alberto Gonzales should always be greeted with appropriate skepticism. So should the claim that he sought to seize control of interim U.S. attorney appointments because of his concern over the "separation of powers" issues supposedly inherent in judges' appointing prosecutors. As the McClatchy Newspapers reported on Jan. 26, Gonzales has named at least nine "conservative loyalists from the Bush administration's inner circle" to positions vacated by professional prosecutors.
Friday, February 9, 2007
Alberto Gonzalez's coup d'etat
That's the title of Joe Conason's analysis of the forced resignations of nine U.S. attorneys, many of whom had pursued criminal investigations of top Republicans.
Labels:
Alberto Gonzales,
U.S. Attorneys Scandal
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment